Less Pretentious Mansions with Carved Stair Parts Main Staircases

Stair Parts. Fig.188. Hokham Hall, Norfolk 1734. Plan of the Principal Floor

The custom of building large houses with detached wings survived well into the middle of the eighteenth century. It will be remembered that Isaac Ware, in his " Complete Body of Architecture" (1756), gives elaborate rules for the proportions and disposition of such edifices; Holkham Hall, in Norfolk, designed by Kent about 1734, and Kedleston Hall, in Derby­shire, designed by James Paine in 1761, are two notable examples still in existence both with Grand central staircases with carved stair parts.

The Design Criteria of the Carved Stair Parts Fitted to the Grand Staircase at Holkham Hall

Stair Parts. Fig. 186 Holkham Hall. The South Front

Holkham is the most important piece of domestic work of the fashionable main staircase with traditional carved stair parts designed by the original architect, William Kent, who was the favourite protege of Lord Burlington. Like most of his contemporaries, Kent passed several years in Italy before doing any work in England. He was of lowly origin, as were many architects of the time. As a start in life he was apprenticed to a coach­painter ; Ripley walked to London at the onset of his career, and obtained work with a journeyman carpenter ; Carr, of York, began as a working mason ; all three were Yorkshire men. Kent early impressed men of position with his unusual capacity, and it was through their kindness that he was enabled to study in Italy, where he appears to have lived from 1710 to 1719. At this time he was studying painting, a pursuit in which, by general consent, he achieved no distinction-at any rate no enviable distinction. Sir Robert Walpole's opinion of his powers in this direction has already been indicated (p. 256). During his stay in Rome he became acquainted with Lord Burlington, who, according to Horace Walpole, "discovered the rich vein of genius that had been hid from the artist himself" He came back to England with his new patron, and thence­forward his success was assured. An apartment was assigned to him in Burlington House as long as lie lived, and on his death "he was buried in a very handsome manner in Lord Burlington's vault at Chiswick."

Endowed with natural abilities above the average, which had been cultivated during nine years in Italy, and fortified by the most powerful patronage of the age, it is no wonder that Kent was able to cut a good figure in the world of art. He became the fashionable decorator and always strongly advocated the use of carved stair parts of the time in many directions, especi­ally in relation to great houses and their surroundings. Walpole had a poor opinion of him as a painter, admired him as an architect, and praised him highly as a garden designer. To us in the present day he appears as a man of considerable ability and culture, who seldom rose above mediocrity, especially in his architecture, which, however sound and correct, is wanting in vivacity. Holkham is a case in point. There is nothing novel about the plan (Stair Parts Fig. 188), save that the wings are closer to the main building than usual ; but in spite of this the kitchen is a long way from the dining-room. The rooms are not particularly striking: the finest are the entrance hall, and the sculpture gallery or " statue gallery," as it is called on the plan in " Vitruvius Britannicus." The house was designed for the reception of the numerous works of art which the owner and builder, Thomas Coke (afterwards created Earl of Leicester), collected in Italy. The collection of pictures, statues, antiques, books, and manuscripts ranks among the finest in England. The opinions of critics on the house are by no means unanimous. Sir William Chambers, for instance, remarks how difficult it is to give pleasing proportions to rooms of differing sizes, but which are all of the same height, and so to arrange the smaller as to con­trive suitable mezzanines and the magnificent Grand staircase above them. " Holkham," he says, " is a masterpiece in this respect, as well as in many others. It deserves much commendation, and does credit to the memory of Mr Kent, it being exceedingly well contrived both for state and convenience." 1 Ferguson, on the other hand, says : " We are left to conjecture whether the noble host and hostess sleep in a bedroom 40 ft. high, or are relegated like their guests to a garret or an outhouse, or perhaps may have their bedroom windows turned inwards on a lead flat." He goes on to say that although the house may be " a monumental interior with Classic staircase design with carved stair parts, yet the occupants would probably prefer rooms of appropriate dimensions, where they could get fresh air and a view of the park."

Both opinions are, or were, probably right. At the time it was built, and for the wants of that period, Holkham was no doubt both convenient and stately. But Ferguson's criticisms find a ready echo in our own bosoms, and they are a measure of the difference between the ideas of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries as to domestic comfort.

The exterior of Holkham (Fig. 189), although a departure from the customary treatment, is hardly an improvement upon it. It is a little monotonous, and the large extent of plain wall above the windows of the principal floor has a dull effect. The plain turrets carved stair parts and the thin cornice of the wings impart a meagre appearance, which is heightened by the fact that the walls are of white brick, a material which remains triste to the end, although centuries may have en­deavoured to mellow it, as they have in vain at Hengrave Hall, in Suffolk.

Stair Parts. Fig. 190.The Horse Guards, Whitehall

Kent's versatility is evidenced at Holkham in the furniture and Grand staircase with its carved stair parts, most of which was designed by him. It is characterised by a solidity and massiveness, both of construction and decora­tion, in striking contrast to the attenuated elegance of his successors.

Kent died in 1748, long before the house was finished; the Earl of Leicester died in 1759, still leaving much to be completed. The manner of his death brings home to us the changes which have taken place in-habits and customs even more vividly than does his house. Lord Leicester had spoken slightingly of the militia at his own table, a topic of general comment at the time; his remarks were taken ill by George Townshend, his neighbour at Rainham, who challenged him to a duel. Townshend was young and a practised duellist; Lord Leicester was a staid gentleman of sixty-five. The result was a foregone conclusion, and the older man died of his wound.